> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
>
> >COBOL by itself doesn't usually s0C4 - COBOL in combination with ASM
is different.
>
> I don't remember the OP saying a thing regarding assembler.
Here's the original post in its entirety (notice the third sentence):
"We ran into a program that was compiled and executed in a COBOL2
environment successfully. When we re-compiled and executed the program
with Enterprise COBOL, it returned a S0C4 abend (rc4). The load module
is a combination of COBOL and assembler code. Anyone know if this is a
COBOL issue or LE?"
Now, since memory is allegedly the second thing to go with age, you
probably don't remember what preceded it. Unfortunately, neither do I.
:-|
-jc-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
