In a recent note, Tony Harminc said: > Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:15:09 -0400 > > They evidently also failed to specify the LOWP option, which is why PROFILE > NOINTERCOM doesn't work. This is another part of the "attitude": "Of course > messages *I* issue are of critical importance, so I'll send them with high > priority". > There might be a presumption that HL*ST output is always electively solicited by the user, who therefore should have no reason to suppress it.
I also note a couple dueling APARs: the TPUTs were done with NOWAIT, causing output to be lost in buffer overflows if the recipient didn't clear the screen, vs. the TPUTS were done with WAIT, locking out HSM if the recipient didn't clear the screen. -- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
