In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 04/20/2006
at 07:19 AM, Peter Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I get very frustrated when I continue to read posts about deleting
>libraries from the LNKLST.
That's only one of many unsafe practices that I've seen advocated.
It's not my dog.
>Anything that intends to delete a library from the LNKLST should be
>prepared for unpredictable errors and immediate re-IPL.
Why? They'll get the unpredictable errors even if they're not
prepared, and the IPL might not take place until after they've had the
opportunity to corrupt some of their data.
<Sound advice clipped - the ones that need it won't heed it>
Needless to say, I agree 100% with what you wrote; I'm just sceptical
of your ability to convince the people that most need your advice. But
ICBW, and it certainly doesn't hurt to warn them.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
