Re: Need Help defining an AS400 with an IP address to the mainframe

[Patrick O'Keefe]

On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:09:30 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> wrote:

>In &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]&gt;, on 04/24/2006
>   at 02:26 AM, Chris Mason &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]&gt; said:
>
>&gt;I think the text you found logically, if not chronologically,
>&gt;precedes the introduction of the type 2.1 node and the introduction
>&gt;of the "control point" as the entity managing the node rather than
>&gt;always the PU.
>
>Chronologically, which is why I made sure to mention that it was old.
>But the PUCP was already there. If you have a recent FAPL manual, is
>there a section on nomenclature around p I-8?
>
>--
>     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
>     ISO position; see &lt;http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html&gt;
>We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
>(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
>Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>=========================================================================

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html