In a recent note, Shane said: > Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 08:38:25 +1000 > > On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 12:18 -0500, Darren Evans-Young wrote: > > Please refrain from using words in your posts that may be > > deemed offensive or "inappropriate". ...like the one just recently posted. > > How is one to judge - see a recent advertising campaign by an agency of > the federal government of this country. > Would such usage "qualify" ???. > *extremely* common usage here. > Can you give a poor isolated provincial Yank a hint? Perhaps a URL that would help me root out what you're talking about?
> Unfortunate side effect - I'm with gil on this. > Much though I flinch at some of Phil's content (but where's Dubbo when he's really needed?), I am more upset that the ignorant masses, promoters of V-chips, Palladium Chips, censorers of Super Bowl entertainment, etc., should interfere with his opportunity to have a platform. And his style, while perhaps unnecessary, is a thin veneer over valuable content. I can take Phil c*m grano salis. (But I was tempted. Only it's too much a pain in the *rse to resubscribe with a different address. And it would bug D. unnecessarily.) -- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
