In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/28/2006
at 03:09 PM, "Patrick O'Keefe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I think you misunderstood my point.
No, you just didn't think it through. The Devil is in the details.
>The Finite State Machines in your FAP describe what programs have to
>do - programs written in whatever is appropriate for the node in
>question. a PUCP is a chunk of code executing in the node.
The entire node is a chunk of code. There is no node type for the
hardware itself.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
