Are you saying that you were so memory constrained that MQ pages were stolen, but by giving WLM an unattainable goal the pages were protected?
On Tue, 16 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>I run production MQ in SYSSTC > >We had problems with doing that (pre-64-Bit). >Because of the load on the system, MQ was constantly getting its data kicked into ESTORE. >This caused many slowdowns. >SYSSTC/SYSTEM tasks (except for GRS) have no memory management, because they have no goals. > >With IMP=1 and a high velocity, MQ queues were kept in central, and other tasks went to expanded. >The WLM had two working set managers: one for central; one for expanded. > >It's less likely to happen on memory-rich 64-bit processors, but the potential is still there. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
