So you really meant re-hosing instead of re-hosting which I assumed.  It
sort of begs the question of when the first hosing occurred.

In any event, thank you for a phrase which will come in quite handy for
several reports I will have to prepare this year.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gibney, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 2:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: obsolete


   You can rest assured, I make typos all the time, but there are none
in this message :) 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
> Behalf Of Schwarz, Barry A
> Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 1:31 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: obsolete
> 
> Perhaps the most correct typing error I've ever seen.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gibney, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 10:13 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: obsolete
> 
> 
>     Don't this year's run a bit better than twice as fast as last
years?
> Of course that just means they are harder to upgrade to with ISV 
> software costs and re-hosing fees.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to