If you force a user to select overly complex passwords and change them
frequently you insure that a significant number of users will store
those passwords in an insecure fashion i.e. Post-It.

I think that some simple rules (min length, require numbers and letters)
and recurring, consistent advocacy on keeping passwords secure,
unwritten, unshared go farther to improve security.  

Help prevent 'Password Rage':-)   Google it.

Tools like Password Safe help too http://passwordsafe.sourceforge.net/

My $0.02. 

        Best Regards, 

                Sam Knutson, GEICO 
                Performance and Availability Management 
                mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
                (office)  301.986.3574 

Our life is frittered away by detail. Simplify, simplify. Henry David
Thoreau (1817
1862)

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 9:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Password Complexity

I read somewhere that the motivation for support of mixed case passwords
in z/OS v1r7 is an external requirement that the password space have
cardinality at least 10^13.  Does any reader of this list know the
source of this requirement?
Sarbanes-Oxley (chapter and verse)?  Other (specify)?

While searching for this (unsuccessfully), I stumbled over several
documents containing a fallacious rationale for frequent password
changes:  If a password-cracking program can discover a password in N
days, one should change one's password no less often than once every N-1
days to be safe.
The inventors of such rules don't understand that N is an upper bound,
and that by happenstance a password might be discovered in seconds; in
other cases take up to almost the N day limit; and that the likelihood
of a success on any single try is not affected by the age of the
password, except insofar as the remaining password space is reduced by
the number of unsuccessful probes.  No matter how often you change your
password, you at best double the average effort for an intruder to
discover it.

-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL
====================
This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this
email/fax is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all paper and electronic copies of the original message.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to