Ray Mullins wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Wednesday May 24 2006 00:10

I think it's typical for IBM. Examples:


<snip>

2. DB2 doesn't (wasn't) check RACF profile when started/closed. Effect: everybody (who can issue operator commands) can kill DB2. The same person can be strictly controlled when i.e. using DISPLAY command, he could be authorized to D SMF, but not D IPLINFO. But not -dsn STOP DB2.


This sort of makes sense, though, if you think about how the command is
being processed.
[...]
No, it doesn't. I know more or less how it's being processed. Simply I don't care. I bought z/OS, RACF and DB2 from same company. It's not safe (disclaimer: I was told it's fixed in v8). For example JES commands are processed in similar way, but RACF protected. OK, I don't insist on RACF, let it be interally (in DB2) protected, via some GRANT. But it's not. It's open for everyone.



3. IND$FILE also uses BLKSIZE of 3200/6160.
There are more examples like the above.


At one time, the linkage editor was very touchy about block sizes > 3200
unless you played games with PARM SIZE= and REGION.

Yes, at one time. 20 years ago ? Is there anything to add here ?

Regards
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to