On Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>------Original Message------
>To: Shane
>Sent: May 24, 2006 19:22
>Subject: Re: fewer/faster vs more/slower in same plex
>
>>I was actually talking about CICS trans level goals.
>Just shows one shouldn't post prior to the first ingestion of caffeine of
the day.
>
Response time goals were available from the beginning of WLM, but
you had to be at CICS 4.1 or above.
>Again, I say "since when"?
>
>At the time I implemented, we had to go to CICS transaction goals!
>CICS 'region' goals were not an option.
So no one is confused by you choice of words ("we had"): That was a
choice you made, not a requirement. It never was and still isn't
required.
>Nor were they for IMS!
>
Ditto.
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
