Judicious use of S99TIONQ?
Maybe use S99CNENQ first?
From: Victor Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: SSI experience
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 11:09:46 -0500
Ed,
My tests indicate that DYNALLOC is in fact colliding on SYSZTIOT with the
SSI Open/Close logic. Could you elaborate a bit on how exactly your BPAM
subsystem avoids the collison?
Thanks!
-Victor-
On Wed, 3 May 2006 14:59:35 -0700, Edward Jaffe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Tom Schmidt wrote:
>> You aren't planning on (or needing to be) doing dynamic allocation
within
>> the SSI Open/Close routines, are you?
>>
>
>We have a subsystem that emulates BPAM for a proprietary library system
>that does just that!
>
>--
>Edward E Jaffe
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
_________________________________________________________________
On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to
get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
