> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Patrick Lyon
> >
> > [ snip ]
> >
> > Does the TCPIP stack need SEZATCP at all? If so, should SEZATCP be
in
> > the LNKLST? Does everyone else have only SEZALOAD in the LNKLST?
>
> From reading the z/OS 1.6 manual (the TCPIP one, not the CICS
> one), it says that SEZATCP should be on the DFHRPL, not the
> STEPLIB. It also says that this library contains the CICS
> interface code, not "general purpose" code. So I would not
> put it in the LNKLST, in the TCPIP procedure, or in the
> STEPLIB for CICS. It appears to be only needed in the DFHRPL
> concatenation.
And it is also true that, once up and running, the CICS loader loads
*exclusively* from DFHRPL; it does not "fall thru" to either STEPLIB or
LNKLST. If CICS Program Management doesn't find what it's looking for
in DFHRPL, "it ain't there".
-jc-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
