Ulrich Krueger wrote:
Pardon me, Radoslav, but why did you create separate SMPE CSI datasets?
AFAIK, Encryption is considered to be a component of the operating system and
should have been installed inside of the SMPE CSI datasets that belong to your
system. This would have resolved any requisites and any other issues you might
now have.
Good question. <g>
I did it, because of SMP/E 'owner' suggestion. In fact, he quickly
changed his mind, when he heard about shared libraries.
As we analyzed the issue, it is unrelated to CSI separation (or we're
wrong).
Side note: It is 'sandbox' system, so it is not very important and we
plan to use regular CSI in the future. Now I want to check everything
(there are much more products in the CBPDO).
As I wrote previously, I made the product running, but I cheated it by
simly copying the member. I don't want to repeat it on our 'mainline'
systems.
Regards
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
