Peter Hunkeler wrote on 06/14/2006 08:09:32 AM: > While being correct, it is highly missleading. The first two sentences > of the Explanation as well as the System Programmer Response talk about > a missing DD statement, not about attributes. So does the message text. > > Why not say the data set has incorrect attributes, right in the message > text?
It looks like AHL084I and a few friends went into GTF in the early 1990s. There is no message that talks about the failure of the tests in question for a specific ddname. AHL084I is produced because, after filtering out ddnames that could not be used on the basis of the tests described, no candidates remain. It is possible that AHL084I was the consequence of forgetting an output ddname entirely. Your suggestion, interpreted in this context, is to add a new message that points at ddname IEFRDER or GTFOUTaa and says something specific about them. We'll add that to a (long) list of things that might improve service aids, reduce confusion using them, and reduce the number of PMRs that result. Bob Wright - MVS Service Aids ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
