As fine a mea culpa as I've read on any Friday in recent memory. ;-) Happy Father's Day to all!
. . JO.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 626-302-7535 Office 323-715-0595 Mobile [EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> 06/16/2006 09:06 AM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> To [email protected] cc Subject Re: [Re: SMP/E "target source library"] In a recent note, Kurt Quackenbush said: > Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:33:42 -0400 > > Ah, now the confusion becomes clear... the developer was in fact > CORRECT. The SYSLIB operand on the ++SRC defines the target library for > the source... it does NOT define the target library for a load module. > I stand corrected. Developer has acknowledged she had a superfluous IEBCOPY step in JCLIN. The problem vanished when she removed that and SYSLIB() concurrently. I can't reproduce the problem, but I haven't tried anything as outrageous as "COPY I=DISTMOD,O=SYSLIB", because she knows better than that. My apologies to: o Kurt Q. for the distraction. o Shmuel for eliciting a defense which was hypothetically valid only given my base misunderstanding. o John G. for provoking a tirade against imprecision which was correct but collateral. Alas, if the verbiage necessary to remove such overloadings in all instances were added, the RM would become prohibitively bulky. Thanks, gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
