I only skimmed through the document, but it appears that WDC simploy settled to avoid the "uncertainties of litigation," or something like that. Having seen some of the vagaries of juries, I would have a hard time arguing with their decision to settle.
Jon <snip> Why didn't the WD lawyers trot out the SI standard? This should have been a summary judgement for the defendant. Or were they playing games with formatted versus unformatted? </snip> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
