In a recent note, Charles Mills said: > Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:00:12 -0700 > > > And what ever was the rationale for this counterintuitive Mickey mouse > > Not having to tear into code that no one wanted to touch. > So, in consequence of a few craven MVS developers, customers need to endure such a travesty of design for the remaining lifetime of z/OS, however brief the aggregate of such improvident choices may deservedly render it?
And yet, I don't understand: the change had to be made somewhere. Why not just extend the syntax of the SPACE parameter rather than providing a new and recondite keyword? -- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
