1. The Assembler code is not LE conforming. Much consists of proprietary type macros (CKSYSTEM, CKDEBUG, CKENTER, CKCOMSHD, CKCALL CKCFNCTR) for example. 2. Compiler options have some differences as expected. The Enterprise Cobol options do have RENTand NOTHREAD 3. The source is exactly the same between runs. Just changing invoking program name.
Alan Schwartz Assurant Shared Business Services Lead Systems Programmer Phone: 651-361-4758 Fax: 651-361-5625 Steve Comstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> 07/06/2006 02:58 PM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> To [email protected] cc Subject Re: COBOL Working Storage being reset 1. Is the Assembler code LE-conforming? 2. Does the compile proc for the Enterprise compiler use different options from the OS/VS compiler? In particular, consider RENT and THREAD 3. Is it the same program each time or do you have Enterprise COBOL version and an OS/VS version? Kind regards, -Steve Comstock ************************************************************************************** This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, forwarding or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. ************************************************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
