I guess the question could be rephrased as
Are the alias(s) only loaded with the base module and an alias entry
itself ignored?
-----Original Message-----
Pommier, Rex R.
But would the system even load MODULE1 from SYS1.LPALIB into the LPA
being that the module is there from the PRODUCT library? My guess is
"no". If that is the case, no module, by extension, no alias to the
module because there wouldn't be a module for it to alias to.
Just a guess.
Rex
-----Original Message-----
Ken Porowski
I have an LPALST concatenation
PRODUCT.LPALIB
SYS1.LPALIB
In PRODUCT.LPALIB is MODULE1 (no alias)
In SYS1.LPALIB is MODULE1 with alias ALIAS1
After IPL (with CLPA of course) I can get to MODULE1 but not to ALIAS1.
Because MODULE1 is a duplicate I expect to get it from PRODUCT.LPALIB
(which I do) because it is first in the concatenation. But because
ALIAS1 is not a duplicate I would expect to still be able to get to it
even if it is from SYS1.LPALIB.
Can anyone confirm that ALIAS1 should be dropped because of the
duplicate of MODULE1?
Thanks all
Ken Porowski
AVP Systems Software
CIT Group
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
