I didn't see much cynicism in my comment, although that may be the result of 
being jaded by my experience with PC manufacturers and their reluctance to 
admit and correct problems. I'm very used to both hardware and software 
manufacturers ignoring obvious problems in their products. 

I may have mis-used the term "cover-up." What I meant was that they[IBM] could 
release software patches that specifically avoid making use of broken circuits 
in silicon. However, I wasn't aware that mainframe developers routinely make 
use of micro-assembly instructions, thereby revealing hardware bugs quickly. 

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of john gilmore
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 11:40 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: z/Architecture design errors


Michael Kuredjian writes

| How do we know the number of hardware design errors? With IA32, it's 
easier to
| discover these problems because the CPU is used by many people under many
| operating systems. IBM designs the OS and CPU, making it much easier to 
cover up
| any problems that do exist.

IBM does design both, but many others write assembly-language code that 
exercises these instructions vigorously.  Microprocessor assemblers are 
toys, designed (to quote myself) to discourage their use.  The IBM HLASM is 
a very different, heavily used animal.

Mr. Kuredjian's sophomore-cynical comment is, however, wide of the mark in 
another way.

There are two ways to deal with errors in this business.  One is to try to 
keep them secret, fixing them under the covers.  The other is to call a 
shovel a spade as quickly as it has been identified in order to turn one's 
back upon it as quickly as possible.

IBM does the second.  The trouble with the first approach is that when, 
inevitably, dissimulation is detected, it becomes a cause celebre.  Even 
Microsoft learned, after a time, that candor about the security deficiencies 
of Windows was the only feasible approach.  It now has its hand held in the 
fire much more briefly than used to be the case.

It is perhaps also worth noting that, while software errors are expensive, 
hardware errors are even more expensive and much more embarassing.  It is 
much cheaper to find them before they get into silicon.

John Gilmore
Ashland, MA 01721-1817
USA

_________________________________________________________________
Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to