Paolo Pirillo wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:06:33 +0200, R.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paolo Pirillo wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:15:09 +0200, R.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
No Problem:
STC05980 00000090 ICH408I JOB(OSASF ) STEP(OSASF ) IOA.CONNECT.FILE
CL(FACILITY) 544
544 00000090 INSUFFICIENT ACCESS AUTHORITY
544 00000090 FROM IOA.** (G)
544 00000090 ACCESS INTENT(CONTROL) ACCESS ALLOWED(NONE )
In RACF is def:
CLASS NAME
----- ----
FACILITY IOA.** (G)
LEVEL OWNER UNIVERSAL ACCESS YOUR ACCESS WARNING
----- -------- ---------------- ----------- -------
00 RACFADV NONE CONTROL NO
The problem is that no UID ist passed!
This is correct. No user (see note *) is passed, because no user is
assigned. ICH408I displays user/group OR job/step when no user is assigned.
Obviously YOU have userid assigned, but the started task, OSASF have
not. That's the problem.
You need to define OSASF in STARTED class, i.e.
RDEF STARTED OSASF.* STDATA(USER(some_user))
some_user need to be authorized to IOA.** at CONTROL level:
PE IOA.** CLASS(FACILITY) ID(some_user) ACC(C)
*Note: don't use UID when talking about user. UID usually means User ID,
part of OMVS segment. This is confusing.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
Excuse me when I was misleading in my expression
That is not the reason. We have defined a USER to OSASF!
IEF695I START OSASF WITH JOBNAME OSASF IS ASSIGNED TO USER STC045
And the USER had access to the FACILITY Profile:
USER ACCESS
---- ------
STC045 CONTROL
Can you check owner of task STC05980 ?
Is it ++++++++ or STC045 ?
IMHO information from message IEF695I is contrary to the ICH408I.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
