Guys, I wasn't serious (note the smiley face). I was (kiddingly) trying to cross threads to show that sequence numbers are not obsolete and do still have a valid use (which Ed already pointed out and I was using his example).
Unless Ed wants to maintain a usermod from now until ????, he is taking the correct approach in changing his code. It's pay me now or pay me later, and Ed has decided to pay now. If he needed to make mass changes to his code to fix something in a short period of time, then I could see using a usermod on a temporary basis and cleaning up later. That isn't the case. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:37:18 -0400, Thompson, Steve (SCI TW) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >How about AIF (D'S99RBXLN).DONE_ALREADY inside the IBM supplied macro? > >You apply this to the macro via USERMOD... > >Regards, >Steve Thompson > ><snip> >Yeah, but how are you gonna know whether to leave it or take it out >without >knowing the DFPLEVEL? Only way I see is PRE and SUP in usermod. ><snip> > On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:35:15 -0500, Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Well, you can use one of those obsolete sequence number things >and create a SMP/E usermod to update the macro. :-) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
