Nothing in my posting suggested that I got from the original posting the information about the NHS not using mainframes.
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Clark Morris Sent: 02 August 2006 15:35 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Finger trouble brings down NHS On 2 Aug 2006 05:30:34 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >I can't believe the cost of that system either - I think I saw on BBC News at >some point that it will end up having cost over 20 BILLION. That's UK Pounds.. >so more than that in USD. > >Gimme a mainframe and some decent programmers and I'll do it for a tenth of >that.. ;-) Nohing in this posting excludes the possibility that the servers are mainframes. The physical disk drives probably would be the same regardless of CPU, just the controllers, connections and operating systems would be different. - This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information of Transaction NetworkServices. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution isprohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact thesender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
