In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/07/2006
at 05:40 PM, Giovanni Cerquone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>As a possibly a neverending debate, I wanto to know, besides storage
>and CPU usage implications, what are the benefits of not having all
>the smf records ON with the exception of 4,5 and 99.
The ability to run ad hoc reports. But go over the list of record
types; some of the older[1] record types are not needed if the newer
ones are enabled and your reports use the newer record types in place
of the old ones.
[1] 4 an 5 are not the only ones.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html