In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/07/2006
   at 05:40 PM, Giovanni Cerquone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

>As a possibly a neverending debate, I wanto to know, besides storage
>and  CPU usage implications, what are the benefits of not having all
>the smf  records ON with the exception of 4,5 and 99.

The ability to run ad hoc reports. But go over the list of record
types; some of the older[1] record types are not needed if the newer
ones are enabled and your reports use the newer record types in place
of the old ones.

[1] 4 an 5 are not the only ones.
 
-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to