In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 08/21/2006
at 03:03 PM, "Ward, Mike S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Hello, all. A bit more investigation is showing that I can use any
>entry in the unit field and the system accepts it. I can use
>unit=sort, unit=mike, unit=ward, etc... Does this mean that I have
>an ACL that is allowing this. Or should I be looking for a user exit
>the replaces the unit parameter? Anyone have a guess? I didn't think
>sms got involved until the interpreter did its job. And then it
>should have crapped out during the interpreter read phase.
Assuming that you mean UNIT=SORT, why would the C/I crap out? It's a
perfectly legitimate value, and only the Initiator or JES3 should care
whether there actually is such an esoteric defined.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
