As of now SHOWzOS has been changed to handle this. 
I agree with ED but can't wait for such kind of discussion and it seems
IBM wont change this. I also guess a lot of source code and release dependent
code might fail because of this. 

Roland

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 6:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Head's Up - zIIP issue OA17458/UA28419


Peter Relson wrote:
> I can only say "I am astonished" that someone would code based on the 
> presence of a field name. We have every right to define fields in any 
> level of macros that are convenient.
>   

And, I'm astonished at your astonishment!

The technique of testing for the presence of control block fields at 
assembly time e.g., AIF (NOT D'CVTHxxxx) to skip around 
release-dependent code for source-maintained products has been a 
standard practice for _decades_ -- ever since the introduction of 
Assembler H (IEV90)! Simply assemble the product against the proper 
maclibs for the target system and all is well.

If this pervasive and well-established technique becomes unreliable, I 
predict *lots* of software will break!

-- 
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, 
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET 
IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at 
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to