LE as used by COBOL and LE as used by PL/1 are wildly different. The functionality is the same but many of the interfaces and defaults are different. For examle, I had a problem whtere the old cobol II runtime was in the joblist - PL/1 ran just fine - COBOL did NOT.
MIke On 8/28/06, Johnny Luo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/28/06, McKown, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Perhaps the problem is in Language Environment, and not the actual > compiler? That would explain why the problem remains on your system. > Just a thought. John, I also thought of LE....but... 'IBM PL/I for MVS&VM v1r1m1' also uses LE. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Best Regards, Johnny Luo ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
-- Mike ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
