Pat Your reference mentions a 3277-3 shortly after the line you quoted. I don't recall that one. I think I remember a 3275-3 - or was that the model number of the copy printer, a 3284 maybe, you could attach to the 3275?
Incidentally a college friend I caught up with last year - after about 30 years - confided in me that Wikipedia contained incorrect information for a maximum of 40 minutes. This perhaps is not the appropriate statistic for Answers.com - and - I bothered to check - neither is it even appropriate for Wikipedia since the same duff information can be found there also. Having been a teacher, I can recognise "copying" when I see precisely the same pattern of mistakes repeated. <g> Chris Mason ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick O'Keefe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, 23 August, 2006 10:01 PM Subject: Re: >27x132? On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:37:38 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <shmuel+ibm- [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >... >>> I have forgotten: is MOD 1 12x40? > >Please show attribution. > >>model 1 is 16x40 > >No. 12*40=480, which is the buffer size give in the documentation. >... That's what I thought, too, but Googling 3270 "Model 1" results in several hits showing 16x40. For instance, http://www.answers.com/topic/3270 3277 model 1 : 16×40 terminal They could be using the same incorrect source, of course. Or they could be talking about physical size including spacing, OIA line, etc., but that shouldn't take 4 lines. I haven't been able to find any IBM doc on Mod 1, but I'm sure it exists. Pat O'Keefe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
