In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/29/2006
   at 05:37 AM, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

>Thus the default presentation space dimensions need *not* necessarily
>always be 24 rows and 80 columns. It may only be a convention that
>they are so limited, a convention established by the choice taken by
>devices which follow the initial design choice of the models 3, 4 and
>5 3278 displays.

The 3180 and 3192 displays could be configured to look like standard
3278 models 2-5 or like extended models 2-5, indicated by model
numbers 2+, 3+, 4+, 5+ or 6-9, depending on which of the two is under
discussion. The extended model numbers allowed a BIND in which the
primary size was *not* 24x80. This functionality was also available on
later 3270 devices. The extended modes were fully supported by CMS, by
TPX, by TSO and by ISPF, at least when the primary size was 43x80 and
the secondary 27x132, which was what I used.
 
-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to