Are you refering to TN3270 connections to SNA sessions? If so, they
are easily secured by a product with which i am familiar.
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
201.626.5363
On Aug 30, 2006, at 1:49 PM, Matthew Stitt wrote:
We've always considered SNA to be the most reliable and secure
networking
system created. But that was in the days of leased lines, and modems
connected directly to the circuits and the FEPs.
With everything running through devices which can be accessed
through the
network, SNA (and everything else) is now vulnerable as was pointed
out.
The article (and the presenter (presumably)) centered on SNA, but
I'm sure
any protocol (or data traffic) is vulnerable using his methods.
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:31:31 -0700, Ray Mullins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Interesting article on the SearchDataCenter site today...
http://tinyurl.com/juuee
Could SNA be cracked? (Note the proper word use here. Hackers do
not do
bad. Crackers do bad.)
Later,
Ray
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
