On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:49:15 -0400, Peter Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well dual-path coding isn't a problem just a simple TM but assembly on any
relase is (was) for me problem. It was very easy before these zIIP FMID
comes a life and there was a seperate FMID for z/OS R6 and R7. So I still
don't understand the benefit to define CVHT7720 in the CVT for z/OS R6.
AIF (T'&SYSSTATE_OSREL EQ 'O').IPA300A RS0806
AIF ('&SYSSTATE_OSREL'(1,6) LT '010107').IPA300A RS0806
DC C'CEE ',AL2(IPACEE-IPAPDESC) RS1105
.IPA300A ANOP RS1105
Hope this helps to avoid such "changes" in the future.
Roland
>The reason I ask is that sometimes there are options in implementation. One
>choice might lead to "need to dual-path your code". Another might not
>(usually this is a more expensive choice, but can sometimes be worth it).
>The better we understand things when we make these choices, the better our
>choice-making is likely to be.
>
>Peter Relson
>z/OS Core Technology Design
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
