Shane wrote on 07/09/2006 12:32:46 +1000 "As a general statement, if the structure owner chooses to use async rather than sync, why would you care ???. If none are actually being converted, pat yourself on the back for a job well done, and go find a real problem to worry about."
Don't be so quick to believe it wasn't converted. If a CF has consistently bad performance issues it quits trying to send sync requests and converts them to async without reporting it as changed. I could not find where this is documented but I know it is true from experience with a test system that had 2 CF's - one of which consistently had performance issues because it was in a remote location. There were very few requests reported by RMF as having been changed but all structures allocated in that CF that were generally sync type requests were converted to async. The similar type structures in the other "good" CF were not converted and were reported as having been sync request. We lived with it because it was just a test system. If and when we had a need to test without the request being converted we favored the "good" CF by ensuring the structure would be allocated in that CF. Maybe one of the IBMers on the list can provide a pointer to the doc that describes this behavior. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
