On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 20:01:56 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 12:32 -0500 on 09/08/2006, Tom Marchant wrote >about Re: How to find source of JES2 change: > >>On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:36:31 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>wrote: >>> >>>Look like an idea for a JES Mod or Feature Enhancement >> >>It *was* an enhancement. So that JES2 would retain modified parameters >> > >The Enhancement I was talking about was NOT the retention of modified >parameters but the reporting of mismatches between the defined (in >the start-up parameters) and the retained parameters that will be >used due to being in the checkpoint dataset. IOW: Report on the >parameters that were overridden by JES2 Commands without >simultaneously updating the Parms (so they are now out of sync). > I agree that it would be a good thing. Submit a requirement. There is already warning messages about mismatches for some of the other (sub) parms where the checkpointed value is used ($HASP496), for example SPOOLDEF, JOBDEF, and OUTDEF. -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
