These values are not defaults, but a set of recommendations presumably based on some measurement of applications since they distinguish between different languages. I know how to tune storage usage by LE and was not looking for some magical solution as you put it but was interested in how the recommendations compared to our own values that we have had implemented for some time. But in this case the recommendation was in error which was the reason for posting the question.
Jim McAlpine On 9/13/06, john gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Performance tuning is not accomplished by adopting a set of defaults. Moreover, the use of a single set of defaults for a class of applications as amorphous as "non-CICS COBOL" is a mug's game. Tuning storage usage by the LE can be accomplished only by obtaining a storage report for each application and setting the LE's stack and heap sizes for that application using the results that this report yields. As I have had occasion to note here before, those who seek magical solutions to their problems shouild consult a haruspex instead of querying this list. John Gilmore Ashland, MA 01721-1817 USA _________________________________________________________________ All-in-one security and maintenance for your PC. Get a free 90-day trial! http://www.windowsonecare.com/trial.aspx?sc_cid=msn_hotmail ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
