In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 09/17/2006
at 10:28 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I believe that if it's called from Rexx as a subroutine (CALL X arg,
>...) or a function (X( arg, ...)), or from the assembler (or
>equivalent) API it will execute in the caller's process space and
>share the caller's environment.
The caller of the subroutine, not the caller of the REXX. I know of no
problem in changing the REXX's environment, just in changing the
REXX's caller's environment. I don't know whether It's an option for
Larry to do his mainline processing in REXX instead of shell.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
