>ITYM that it's your *opinion* that TSO and production should be kept separate, >but what do you mean by that?
No! It's not my opinion. It's from an old document from IBM, and I tend to agree with it. It's not for security reasons; RACF/ACF2/TOPSECRET can handle that. It's for performance reasons. You either have poor TSO response, or you have it impacting production. Neither is a good thing! >Separate LPAR? Good enough. When in doubt. PANIC!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
