In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 09/28/2006
at 01:23 AM, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Why does the compiler have to be APF'd?
It doesn't.
>That's the way I have seen it at every shop I have worked at.
I'm not surprised, but that doesn't mean that it has to be or even
should be. My guess is the "dusty deck" syndrome, where somebody
copied something that was either incorrect or well out of date.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
