In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 09/28/2006
at 08:37 AM, "Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Changed since when? My expirience does not go back to the early 60's
MVT was current in the late 1960's.
>but since SVS I have not seen the problem.
K3wl. How does that make the current code a logical necessity?
>Yes, I implied some common sense, or logical necessity if you like:
Data trump theories. Nor are your ideas of common sense necessarily
those of the developers. Sometimes they know things that you don't.
>When you invent aliasses and see (if you think about it) that you
> can violate data integrity,
OS/360 did *lot's* of things that violated data integrity.
>When were aliasses invented?
They were certainly present in OS/360, but not in the form that they
are today. Instead of an ICF catalog there was something called a
CVOL, with the root CVOL called SYSCTLG, and alias entries were only
for the first index level.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
