At this point I am full tilt on the real problem (which has little to do with STEPLIBs -- I just need to be able to switch libraries to test what I was actually trying to test). I "solved" the STEPLIB problem by using SETPROG LPA,ADD/DELETE and I'm too busy to debug TSO and Rexx. If Rexx won't use TSOLIB or the CALL loadlib then that's the end of that road -- knowing exactly why they don't is a problem for sometime when I have more curiosity time on my hands.
Thanks everyone for your suggestions. The CBT or GSF STEPLIB command looks like a winner, but SETPROG LPA got me going quicker. If I get into this bind again, I'll probably devote some time to installing one of those, not to tracing Rexx. Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 4:34 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Allocating "STEPLIB" in TSO Charles Mills wrote: > Our system. I am testing. And no, we have almost no non-IBM software. > I assume you know how to use GTF to trace exactly what's happening. -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-338-0400 x318 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
