On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:28:54 -0700, Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>... >Thanks for pointing out that he meant Netview Access Services (NVAS) and >not Netview. Unlike Netview, which needs a special modification to work >with other than 24x80 default screens, NVAS should work just fine. We >used it here up until just a few months ago and never had any trouble >with 3270 terminal sizes with more than 24 default rows. Perhaps it's a >configuration/logmode issue. >... One of the problems with NetView is that it has hundreds of hard coded 24x80 panels. Even if it did an Erase write Alternate for them the display would still be 24x80 bytes of the larger screen. They have had the capability for building and displaying larger screen sizes for many years but have not had time, money, or justification to rework all those panels and the code that builds the data for them. (Unlike ISPF, NetView's display-building logic is not part of the panel definition.) Pat O'Keefe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
