On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:03:09 -0700 Charles Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>That's not too bad then. I just have to copy the thing over and do my own :>pseudo-INCLUDE processing. More work than I anticipated, but not too bad. :>I don't really need to use SUB at all, do I? I could just as easily do :>"ALLOC FI(MYDD) SYSOUT(A) WRITER(INTRDR)" :>And EXECIO the thing to MYDD. Does anyone know for certain that that works, :>or does not work? I would recommend doing QUEUE's followed bu SUBMIT * :>-----Original Message----- :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf :>Of Binyamin Dissen :>Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 2:27 PM :>To: [email protected] :>Subject: Re: Collisions between converter(?) and TSO? :>On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:48:17 -0700 Charles Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: :>:>Thanks. I can do almost anything but this will require some re-thinking. :>:>In the INCLUDE is SET and DD statements used by the job. :>:>> Can you place it in-line? :>:>Are you implying that the basic job file is completely read before the TSO :>:>SUBMIT command returns to the issuer? In other words, that the following :>:>sequence would be safe? :>:>"SUB X.CNTL(ABC)" :>:>Allocate, modify, and free X.CNTL(ABC) :>:>"SUB X.CNTL(ABC)" :>Yes. :>SUBMIT simply copies it to SYSOUT(INTRDR) :>You could equally put it into the REXX stack and then do a :> SUBMIT * -- Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
