I was going to suggest binary transfer if you could talk the partner into it. Since the source and eventual target are both z-boxes, why go thru the CPU cycles to do two data transformations.
Rex -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 3:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: FTP has extra CR On 17 Oct 2006 12:44:29 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >Nothing on your side can control this. Off hand I would say either the >souce file has an extra x'0D' on the end of every line or the ftp >client is not properly putting x'0D0A' on the end of each record. I don't know if they have changed anything - we did have to patch our CA FTP recently when we upgraded our OS (it wasn't handling binary FTP to tape correctly). If they haven't changed anything, we could try binary FTPs. But I'm hoping someone else has this problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
