> SYS1.ASRLIB was also relevant to the S/370. True, but the /165's TTL memory didn't have a fraction of the problems the /65's core had. Didn't figure.
> Why would it, unless you were writing a nucleus csect, an ERP or an SVC? The > MCH in OS/360 never refreshed anything else. Very true, but not obvious from the marketing material at that time. Hence the education process I described, and hence the outcome I described. Du'uh. -- Phil Payne http://www.isham-research.co.uk +44 7833 654 800 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
