>IBM seemed to think leaving them as 32 is the way to go but I would like some >other opinions
If you are ever going to grow, I would define it to 32. 32 is the current (and always has been the) maximum the architecture supports. When we first implemented in 1994, I recommended the max be specified. They ignored me an set it to the current number of images. Two years later, we tried to expand by two, and it was a mess! There is very little overhead in defining the max, and it can reduce future headaches. The overhead comes when the systems activate. When in doubt. PANIC!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
