In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 11/06/2006
at 11:47 AM, "Joseph W. Beiter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>are there conditions where a pe'd ptf is not sup'd but instead marked
>per by the correting ptf ?
There is, in general, no reason for the correcting PTF to supersede
the PTF in error. What it needs to supersede in the sysmod given as
the reason for the HOLD, normally the APAR for the PE.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
