In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 11/21/2006
   at 06:32 AM, Howard Brazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

>It was interesting to compare the boxes in different companies'
>mainframes - sometimes everything was in a box, other times these I/O
>functions were in another box.

Just like IBM. Quite a few IBM mainframes had inboard channels, using
cycle stealing.
 
-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to