Sorry people.  I was on vacation and am just catching up on some IBMMain 
emails

We started having this problem after we upgraded to 1.7 in two of our 
lpars with a shared spool.  We also periodically issue $TOJQ commands to 
change the DEST for jobs in specific classes.  Our performance people 
noticed an increase of 8-10 mips for JES2 and asked us to inquire.

We opened a pmr with IBM.  Their initial meaningful response was:

I know that some part of command processing was enhanced at 1.7, but I'm 
not sure if this kind of change would have a 
relation with what you experienced.   Generally speaking, when multiple 
filters are being used  on JES2 command, it is suggested that a 
limited range is being used as opposed of a wide range, specially if your 
environment have large queues (many outputs on the queues). 
If possible, I would like to determine that the cause of  the 
$HASP263/$HASP9207 messages is really caused by these 
commands.  Any possibility to have the command not being issued 
temporarily, or have it issued at larger interval, and monitor
the issuance of the messages based on the changes....         If the above 
is not a viable option, you could break the 
command into smaller chunks:  $TOJ1-20000... 
 $TOJ20001-40000 
 ... 
Each of the above could be issued at different time (not  all issued at 
the same time, or else it will be equivalent to one large command).        
 
Even if the command des not actually change any of the output, the 
processing of the filtering options does require quite a bit of cycles if 
the queues are large.

followed by:

I had a talk with JES2 development... 
 
What you are experiencing is due to the code change introduced at 1.7 for 
command processing.  At that release, numerous filters were added and 
although there would be a need of  additionnal cycles needed for the 
enhancements, the overall  performance would be negligible on most 
command... except when using wide range, or JQ, plus adding multiple 
filters to the command.  
If the command must need all those filters, then you need to break the 
command into smaller chunks.  First thing you should do is specify a range 

of couple thousand jobs at a time.

We have increased the time between issuing the $TOJQ commands and JES2 cpu 
utilization has dropped but still not to where it was prior to 1.7

Alan Schwartz
Assurant Shared Business Services
Lead Systems Programmer
Phone:  651-361-4758
Fax:       651-361-5625



Brian Westerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]>
12/04/2006 12:48 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]>


To
[email protected]
cc

Subject
Re: JES2 performance problem - z/OS 1.7






I don't understand, I can't reproduce your problem on my systems here and
it's a pretty eclectic group of systems. 

Can you tell how many jobs are actually purged when you enter the command?

I just don't see anything in your parms that would allow your system to 
hang
on to the Checkpoint dataset for 14+ seconds.  We must be missing 
something.
 There has to be something external (to jes) that's going on to allow the
checkpoint to be held for so long with no other exterior indication of a
problem.

Brian


**************************************************************************************
This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally 
privileged and/or confidential information intended solely for the use of the 
addressee(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, 
forwarding or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the 
sender immediately and delete this message and all copies and backups thereof.

Thank you.
**************************************************************************************

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to