In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 11/28/2006
at 06:36 AM, Tom Marchant said:
>IMHO, it should have been coded with an ENQ or some other suitable
>method of serializing it's use it so that there would be no
>conflicts.
At a minimum. Preferably it should have been coded to accept a ddname
list *and* it should have done an ENQ using the ddnames as minor queue
names.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
