From: Tom Marchant
What's wrong with the ABEND macro?
ABEND macro requires setup, changes registers, etc.
If it's a true "this *should* never happen" scenario,
a S0C3 (or similar) abend preserves registers, etc.
From: Tom Marchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: S0C1 with ILC 6
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 07:22:27 -0600
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:17:31 -0600, McKown, John wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
>>
>> A further thought, it might be intentional. This
>> particular ISV has a
>> nasty habit of using 0C1 for debugging and as a response to unexpected
>> circumstances. Usually, there's at least an eyecatcher.
>
>I use a S0C3 for that. There is very little chance that an S0C3 is
>anything other than deliberate. I.e. "EX 0,*" must be deliberate.
>
What's wrong with the ABEND macro? Preferably preceded by a WTO with
ROUTCDE=11.
--
Tom Marchant
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Shopping has everything on your holiday list. Get expert picks by style,
age, and price. Try it!
http://shopping.msn.com/content/shp/?ctId=8000,ptnrid=176,ptnrdata=200601&tcode=wlmtagline
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
